Gershon Baskin

The end of the ceasefire, the renewal of war and the end game


Gershon Baskin. Photo: Otmar Steinbicker

It is clear to me that Hamas has no coherent exit strategy or end game. Many of the demands they placed on the table in Cairo had no chance of being accepted by Israel and Egypt. Hamas on one side, Israel and Egypt, on the other side are locked into a negotiation, at this point, that has little chance of being successful, which is why the ceasefire ended.

According to what I hear, there was even great frustration from the exaggerated Hamas demands within the Palestinian delegation, and delegation head Azzam al Ahmad almost left the talks. All Palestinians will support the Hamas demands, and they should. Who would not want a renewed airport in Gaza, or a sea port, or completely free movement of people and goods in and out of Gaza, or the safe passage from Gaza to the West Bank, or the end of Israeli control over Gaza's coastal waters, an end to all Israeli attacks on Gaza? The Egyptians told the Palestinian delegation that most of their demands relate to negotiations for peace between Palestine and Israel and not the conditions for a long term ceasefire. But is Hamas prepared to negotiate peace with Israel? God forbid. Hamas still wants to destroy Israel and expects Israel to give them the tools to achieve this goal. There will be changes in Israel's isolation of Gaza policy after the war, but they won't even get near to what Hamas is demanding.

Both Israel and Egypt have decided that any political "prizes" from the aftermath of this war must be accredited to Abu Mazen and not to Hamas. That must be a big one for Netanyahu to swallow, but even he has no choice if the end result of this war will not be empowered Hamas.

Hamas expert Shlomi Eldar says that Hamas's end game is solely its own survival as a political movement and as such, he claims Hamas is prepared to destroy all of Gaza for that purpose. I don't totally agree with Shlomi, although I greatly respect his opinion. I think that Hamas fighters are not afraid to die and are willing to fight until the very end. The Hamas political leaders though are a group of cowards criminal in their behavior who have the gall to emerge from their safe bunkers under ground and declare victory. Haniyeh was seen yesterday standing in front of rubble that had been someone's home with a big smile on his face. Those kind of leaders should face the trial of their own people when this is over and treated in the same way that Abed el Fatah a-Sisi dealt the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt who brought that country to near destruction. This is something that the Palestinian people will need to decide when the war is over. As a friend of Palestine, I hope that they do it.

Now, I return to what I have been saying from even before this horrible war began: there is only one solution to his which has a good outcome for all of the peoples engaged and most of the leaders as well - a political solution which deals with the security issues, the economic issues and the political issues. Palestine must be a free, economically viable state living in peace with its neighbors. A non-militarized Palestine in the West Bank and Gaza with its capital in Palestinian Jerusalem, with agreed security arrangements with Israel, negotiated and agreed borders, a fair agreed solution to the refugee problem, full mutual recognition of the two states for two peoples solution, with regional security accords, and recognition of Israel by its neighbors - this is the solution which must emerge from this war. It starts with Israeli acceptance of the Arab Peace Initiative as the basis of negotiations with the Palestinians and the Arab world.

This must become the new initiative for peace in the region. I call on Saudi Arabia which launched the Arab Peace Initiative to take the next step and lead us on the path to making it happen. A Saudi initiative in this direction would be so much more fruitful than another Kerry initiative. This is the way forward, and it can be done.

Gershon Baskin is the co-chairman of IPCRI, the Israel Palestine Center for Research and Information, a columnist for The Jerusalem Post and the initiator and negotiator of the secret back channel for the release of Gilad Schalit. His new book, Freeing Gilad: the Secret Back Channel, has been published by Kinneret Zmora Bitan in Hebrew.

Gershon Baskin ist Autor des Aachener Friedensmagazins Seine Beiträge finden Sie hier

World Wide Web

Beiträge von Gershon Baskin

De-risking peace - Part I

The Left is right

The French connection

The United Nations and Israel’s legitimacy

A moment of opportunity

The darkness of our times

Addressing the core

The worst negotiations, the best negotiations

Palestinian turmoil and Israeli interests

This one is for you - the Palestinians

Palestinian suffering makes no sense for Israel

Creating a compelling vision for peace

It is also in our hands

Sooner or later

There is no partner

There is no partner


Yes, it is difficult to make peace

What does he really want?

To those who oppose Israeli-Palestinian peace

Israel – my sad home

Have I got news for you

It is still not too late for peace

Netanyahu, tell us what you really think!

The partnership challenge

The binational reality that we are experiencing

Abbas is still the leader who can make peace

A new intifada?

After Abbas

The distance between here and peace and security

Doing the wrong thing at that wrong time

The one and only solution!

Yeshayahu Leibowitz was right!

The disengagement – 10 years on: What we choose to forget

Needed - a new approach to Gaza

A bad agreement is better than no agreement

Obviously no peace now, so what then?

Ramadan Kareem!

Israel’s strategic choices regarding Gaza

Anti-normalization hypocrites

FIFA, soccer and the Palestinians

Both sides now

It’s time for Palestine

The citizens’ challenge – from despair to hope

We have the chance to do the right thing in Yarmouks

The world is not against us

This is what you voted for, and this is what you will get

The no decision elections

A cautious peace, but peace nevertheless

For the sake of Israel, Netanyahu must be sent home

Going ballistic even prior to an agreement

To the new IDF chief of staff, Gadi Eisenkot

The Peace Bridge

The choices we must make

Israeli elections – It’s not about the economy

Threats and security


Returning to negotiations

Our most important elections

The missed opportunities

We want peace, but they don't

Our future is in our hands

Defining who we are

Unlike religious wars, political wars have solutions

Today and tomorrow

If we had a real leader

Jerusalem of peace, Jerusalem of war

No tango going on at all

The Gaza challenge

Is Hamas prepared to end this war with a long-term ceasefire?

The end of the ceasefire, the renewal of war and the end game

The aftermath

Some thoughts this morning

Regional forum for security and stability – Gaza first

After a long phone conversation with a Hamas leader in Gaza

Don’t destroy Gaza, build it!

Framework document for the establishment of permanent peace (part 3 of 3)

Framework document for the establishment of permanent peace (part 2 of 3)

Framework document for the establishment of permanent peace

Palestinian refugees in Syria

Annexing the West Bank – a catastrophic plan for the Jewish people

Mutual and reciprocal recognition

Our Palestinians, their Jews

A very personal statement on peace


Contextual reciprocity

Negotiating atmospherics

My Conversation With Hamas

Ramadan Kareem

Wahrheit, Lügen und Rechtmäßigkeit

Kauft palästinensisch!

Rat für den Präsidenten

Keine Fortsetzung des Unilateralismus!

Diesen Weg müssen wir einschlagen!

Die Kluft im Umgang mit den israelischen Arabern schließen


Eine Ein-Staat-Realität ist nicht durchführbar

Strategische Fehler und Herausforderungen

Mord an der Chance für Ruhe

Das Ende des Raketenbeschusses aus Gaza

Die Aufgabe eines Staatsmannes

Es gibt einen Ausweg

Atomwaffen raus aus dem Arsenal

Was Abbas Israel sagen sollte

Obama, gestatte es uns nicht!

Ist mein zionistischer Traum gestorben?